Culling and Teaching in Neuro-Evolution
By P. McQuesten, Risto Miikkulainen. 1997
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- J. Urgen Schmidhuber
- Kenneth O. Stanley
- Shimon Whiteson
- Sebastian Risi
- Joel Lehman
- Risto Miikkulainen
- Sergey Levine
- Yoshua Bengio
Citations in the corpus
- Born to Learn: the Inspiration, Progress, and Future of Evolved Plastic Artificial Neural Networks (2017, background): “McQuesten and Miikkulainen (1997) showed that neuroevolution can benefit from parent networks teaching their offspring through backpropagation.”
- Evolutionary Computation for Reinforcement Learning (2012, background): “ents (McQuesten and Miikkulainen, 1997), trained them to predict state transitions (Nolfi et al, 1994), and trained them to teach themselves (Nolfi and Parisi, 1997).”
- Evolutionary Function Approximation for Reinforcement Learning (2006, background): “Stanley and Miikkulainen (Stanley and Miikkulainen, 2002) present a full description.”
- Evolving plastic neural networks with novelty search (2010, background): “Furthermore, McQuesten and Miikkulainen (1997) showed that NE can benefit from parent networks teaching their offspring through backpropagation.”
- Evolving adaptive neural networks with and without adaptive synapses (2003, background): “McQuesten and Miikkulainen (1997) showed that parent networks can teach their offspring using backpropagation.”
- Modeling systems with internal state using evolino (2005, background): “Although Evolino does not use learning in the traditional gradient-descent sense, it is related to other hybrid evolutionary methods that adapt weight values during interaction with the evaluation environment [16, 25, 14].”