In search of WTO trade effects: Preferential trade agreements promote trade strongly, but unevenly

By Theo S. Eicher, C. Henn. 2011

225 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29f1a8d93123587f073ece676cff6f32d371da54

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Pushan Dutt
2. I. Mihov
3. Timothy Van Zandt
4. K. Staehr
5. Jaejoon Woo
6. Eduardo A. Cavallo

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Pushan Dutt
2. I. Mihov
3. Timothy Van Zandt
4. K. Staehr
5. Jaejoon Woo
6. Eduardo A. Cavallo

In Strategy and Management

1. Pushan Dutt
2. I. Mihov
3. Timothy Van Zandt

Citations in the corpus

• The cost of non-Europe, revisited* (2019, unknown): “The preferred EU effects estimate of Baier et al. (2014) and Eicher and Henn (2011) are other examples finding that the deep integration agreements such as the EU have a much larger trade impact than standard RTAs.”
• The Effect of WTO on the Extensive and the Intensive Margins of Trade (2013, background): “However, as Eicher and Henn (2011) point out, Subramanian and Wei's hierarchical classification of dummies, with PTAs at the top andWTO at the bottom of the classification hierarchy, assumes that PTA membership represents the culmination of trade integration.”