Mediterranean pine and oak distribution in southern Spain: Is there a mismatch between regeneration and adult distribution?

By I. Urbieta, Luis V. García, M. A. Zavala, T. Marañón. 2011

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Questions: What is the current distribution of pine and oak species along environmental gradients in southern Spain? Do pine and oak regeneration niches differ from the environmental niches of adults? Is oak species regeneration favoured under the canopy of pine forests? Location: Forest areas of Andalusia (87600km 2 , southern Spain). Methods: We compiled extensive forest inventory data to explore differences in abundance (basal area, m 2 ha 1 ) patterns of adults (dbh 47.4cm) and regeneration (dbh 7.4cm) of five pine and five oak species. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) and generalized linear models were applied to explore species‐environment relationships along climatic, edaphic, topographic and fire-frequency gradients. Results: Both pines and oaks segregated along complex environmental gradients, with pines generally dominating in more severe (colder and drier) environments, while oaks dominated in milder, wetter winter areas. In 40-55% of mature pine stands there was a lack of regeneration in the understorey, while in two oak species (Q. suber and Q. canariensis) 70% of stands did not show regeneration. Pine recruits were found at a higher frequency and abundance under the canopy of their congeners, whereas some oaks (Q. ilex) had greater regeneration under mixed pine‐oak canopies. Conclusions: Climatic limitations and soil properties partly explained the regional distribution of pines and oaks. We found evidence for an upward shift of Q. ilex recruits towards areas with colder conditions in pine forests, which could be explained by a possible facilitative effect of the pine canopy on seedling establishment.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29e756ea7f228fdba0d5db1092fa3b920853b62b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. M. de Luis
  2. J. Gričar
  3. K. Čufar
  4. Marta Coll
  5. Josep Peñuelas
  6. J. Raventós
  7. Klemen Novak
  8. P. Prislan

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

  1. J. Carnicer
  2. Josep Peñuelas
  3. Marta Coll
  4. Jordi Vayreda
  5. J. Raventós
  6. M. de Luis
  7. Xavier Pons
  8. Klemen Novak

Citations in the corpus