Molecular phylogeny, classification, and biogeography of snakes of the Family Leptotyphlopidae (Reptilia, Squamata)
By Solny A. Adalsteinsson, W. Branch, S. Trape, L. Vitt, S. Blair Hedges. Zootaxa, 2009
134 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The family Leptotyphlopidae (116 species) includes the smallest and thinnest species of snakes, often called threadsnakes (or wormsnakes). They are burrowing, have small eyes, and they feed on several life history stages of social insects. Leptotyphlopids have a West Gondwanan distribution, occurring primarily in Africa and the Neotropics (South America, Middle America, and the West Indies). The family is one of the most poorly known of all terrestrial vertebrates from the standpoint of systematics and ecology. No published phylogenetic studies of higher-level relationships exist, either from morphological or molecular data. Here we present DNA sequence analyses of 91 individuals representing 34 recognized species of leptotyphlopids, from nine mitochondrial and nuclear genes. The results show divergences among living lineages as early as the mid-Cretaceous, 92 (113–75) million years ago (Ma) and evidence that the breakup of West Gondwana into South America and Africa, and the separation of West Africa from South and East Africa by high sea levels in the Cretaceous, influenced the biogeographic history of the family through isolation. A Late Cretaceous (78 Ma; 98–63 Ma) transatlantic dispersal from West Africa to South America may explain the origin of the monophyletic New World radiation. Mid-Cenozoic divergences among Middle and North American species indicate that leptotyphlopids dispersed to those regions from South America, by rafting over water, prior to the emergence of the Isthmus of Panama. A revised classification recognizes two subfamilies, Epictinae subfam. nov. (New World and Africa) and Leptotyphlopinae (Africa, Arabia, and Southwest Asia). Within the Epictinae we recognize two tribes (Epictini trib. nov. and Rhinoleptini trib. nov.), three subtribes (Epictina subtrib. nov., Tetracheilostomina subtrib. nov., and Renina subtrib. nov.), and eight genera (Epictia, Guinea gen. nov., Mitophis gen. nov., Rena, Rhinoleptus, Siagonodon, Tetracheilostoma, and Tricheilostoma). Three tribes are recognized within the Leptotyphlopinae (Epacrophini trib. nov., Myriopholini trib. nov., and Leptotyphlopini trib. nov.) and four genera (Epacrophis gen. nov., Myriopholis gen. nov., Leptotyphlops, and Namibiana gen. nov.). The significant non-monophyly of some species and the estimated long period of time (tens of millions of years) separating populations of currently recognized species indicate that an unusually large number of species exist that are unrecognized. This combined with small distributions and high levels of deforestation in these areas argue for increased awareness of leptotyphlopids and other burrowing reptiles in conservation planning.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29e4bce576c8f128a8b72ef74b353c2bdbb30936
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Global and Planetary Change
- D. G. Chapple
- Mark‐Oliver Rödel
- Shai Meiri
- W. Magnusson
- D. Gower
- M. Martins
- M. Dorcas
- C. Hilton‐Taylor
Citations in the corpus
- The conservation status of the world's reptiles (2013, background): “A total of 9,084 species of reptiles have been described so far (Uetz, 2010), and new molecular evidence continues to unearth numerous cryptic species that had not previously been detected by morphological analyses (e.g., Adalsteinsson et al., 2009; Nagy et al., 2012; Oliver et al., 2009).”
- A taxonomic framework for typhlopid snakes from the Caribbean and other regions (Reptilia, Squamata) (2014, methodology): “Until recently (Adalsteinsson et al. 2009; Vidal et al. 2010), there was no published tree of the evolutionary relationships of scolecophidians, which is remarkable for a major group of vertebrates.”