Vote-earning strategies in flexible list systems: Seats at the price of unity

By Brian F. Crisp, Santiago Olivella, Michael Malecki, M. Sher. 2013

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29dffd326e5921e0fd31f3bd85d5504ae578232a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Olle Folke
2. Johanna Rickne
3. Torsten Persson
4. Guido Tabellini
5. W. Henisz
6. Daron Acemoglu
7. Timothy J. Besley
8. Philip E. Keefer

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Olle Folke
2. Johanna Rickne
3. Torsten Persson

In Safety Research

1. Johanna Rickne
2. Torsten Persson

Citations in the corpus

• The Primary Effect: Preference Votes and Political Promotions (2016, background): “If parties use preference votes to guide top appointments, this will likely increase candidate vote-seeking behavior, such as deviations from the party line or bill initiation (see Bräuninger, Brunner, and Däubler 2012, and Crisp et al. 2013).”
• Local Favoritism in At-Large Proportional Representation Systems (2016, unknown): “Due to its (Crisp et al., 2013).”