Food insufficiency and American school-aged children's cognitive, academic, and psychosocial development.

By K. Alaimo, C. Olson, E. Frongillo. Pediatrics, 2001

981 citations recorded by the source corpus.

OBJECTIVE This study investigates associations between food insufficiency and cognitive, academic, and psychosocial outcomes for US children and teenagers ages 6 to 11 and 12 to 16 years. METHODS Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) were analyzed. Children were classified as food-insufficient if the family respondent reported that his or her family sometimes or often did not get enough food to eat. Regression analyses were conducted to test for associations between food insufficiency and cognitive, academic, and psychosocial measures in general and then within lower-risk and higher-risk groups. Regression coefficients and odds ratios for food insufficiency are reported, adjusted for poverty status and other potential confounding factors. RESULTS After adjusting for confounding variables, 6- to 11-year-old food-insufficient children had significantly lower arithmetic scores and were more likely to have repeated a grade, have seen a psychologist, and have had difficulty getting along with other children. Food-insufficient teenagers were more likely to have seen a psychologist, have been suspended from school, and have had difficulty getting along with other children. Further analyses divided children into lower-risk and higher-risk groups. The associations between food insufficiency and children's outcomes varied by level of risk. CONCLUSIONS The results demonstrate that negative academic and psychosocial outcomes are associated with family-level food insufficiency and provide support for public health efforts to increase the food security of American families.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29cd61d634786dd3b075eeeb06349a98ea0535c6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

  1. V. Tarasuk
  2. Cliff A. Robb
  3. C. Gundersen
  4. M. Nord
  5. Alisha Coleman-Jensen

In Psychiatry and Mental health

  1. V. Tarasuk
  2. C. Gundersen
  3. Alisha Coleman-Jensen
  4. M. Nord

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

  1. V. Tarasuk
  2. Alisha Coleman-Jensen
  3. M. Nord

Citations in the corpus