The Effect of School Accountability Systems on the Level and Distribution of Student Achievement
By Eric A. Hanushek, Margaret E. Raymond. 2004
170 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Information Systems and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29a030fbcc844563cea98f12a8b9d4f0b642e5d8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Ludger Woessmann
- Ludger Wößmann
- Guido Schwerdt
- Martin Schlotter
- David Dranove
- G. Jin
- Jiaqi Liang
- L. Langbein
In Information Systems and Management
- David Dranove
- Ludger Wößmann
- G. Jin
- Ludger Woessmann
- Jiaqi Liang
- L. Langbein
- Guido Schwerdt
- Martin Schlotter
Citations in the corpus
- Performance Management, High-Powered Incentives, and Environmental Policies in China (2015, background): “…have been extensively examined in the U.S. and Europe using the theoretical perspective of performance management (e.g., Bohte and Meier 2000; Hanushek and Raymond 2004; 2005; Heinrich 2002; 2004; Heinrich and Choi 2007; Podgursky and Springer 2007; 2011), little research has been undertaken…”
- Incentives for Managers and Inequality Among Workers: Evidence from a Firm Level Experiment (2007, unknown): “Similarly, Hanushek and Raymond (2004) and Reback (2005) provide evidence on the distributional consequences on student achievement under the No Child Left Behind policy.”
- Econometric methods for causal evaluation of education policies and practices: a non‐technical guide (2011, methodology): “In a similar study, Hanushek and Raymond ( 2004 ) use a DiD set‐up to analyze how the differential introduction of accountability across US states affected the relative change in student performance.”
- Quality Disclosure and Certification: Theory and Practice (2010, background): “Most available studies find that accountability has had a positive effect on student outcomes (Carnoy and Loeb, 2002; Hanushek and Raymond, 2004; Jacob, 2005; Peterson and West, 2003).”
- International Evidence on School Competition, Autonomy, and Accountability: A Review (2007, background): “Another means to increase accountability are explicit school-focused accountability systems, which have been shown to increase students’ learning achievement in the United States (Carnoy & Loeb, 2003; Hanushek & Raymond, 2004; Jacob, 2005).”