Ejaculate expenditures of male crickets in response to varying risk and intensity of sperm competition: not all species play games

By J. M. Schaus, S. Sakaluk. 2001

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29a01b40b53ad97d65bccdd749e20c963177a90a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Hanna Kokko
2. G. Parker
3. N. Wedell
4. Daniel J. Rankin
5. Leigh W. Simmons
6. L. Schärer
7. Dominic A. Edward
8. Michael D. Jennions

In Genetics

1. Hanna Kokko
2. G. Parker
3. Daniel J. Rankin
4. N. Wedell
5. Dominic A. Edward

Citations in the corpus

• Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems (2006, background): “B (2006) investment in sperm competition and mate searching (Stockley & Seal 2001; but for negative results on other species, see e.g. Evans & Magurran 1999; Schaus & Sakaluk 2001).”
• Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females (2002, background): “House cricket Acheta domesticus [51] Decorated cricket Gryllodes supplicans (sigillatus) [51] Spring field cricket Gryllus veletis [ 52 ] a”