Nichtlineare Finite-Element-Methoden

By Peter Wriggers. 2001

298 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29856be5e5fc43fe149354bacbad07ead4492bf9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Ralf Müller
2. G. Maugin
3. K. Nachbagauer
4. Paul Steinmann
5. Andreas Menzel
6. Ralf Denzer

In Control and Systems Engineering

1. G. Maugin
2. Ralf Müller
3. K. Nachbagauer

In Mechanical Engineering

1. G. Maugin
2. Ralf Müller
3. K. Nachbagauer

Citations in the corpus

• Efficient model reduction in non-linear dynamics using the Karhunen-Loève expansion and dual-weighted-residual methods (2003, unknown): “Implicit methods allow larger time steps [50], but iteratively solving the non-linear system by repeated solutions of linear systems can be very time and memory consuming.”
• On material forces and finite element discretizations (2002, methodology): “For the computational setting a FE formulation in the actual configuration is chosen, as this formulation is more efficient – for a detailed discussion the reader is referred to Wriggers (2001).”
• A Finite Element approach with patch projection for strain gradient plasticity formulations (2007, unknown): “The FEM discretization yields (see, e.g., Wriggers, 2001)Z B S dEdV [ne e¼1 XnI I¼1 duTI Z V e BTI Se dV ¼ [ne e¼1 XnI I¼1 duTI RIðueÞ ð33Þ where RIðueÞ ¼ R V e BTI Se dV .”
• State of the Art of ANCF Elements Regarding Geometric Description, Interpolation Strategies, Definition of Elastic Forces, Validation and the Locking Phenomenon in Comparison with Proposed Beam Finite Elements (2014, methodology): “, [5,26,136,138].”