A catalogue of three-level regular fractional factorial designs

69 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Complete enumeration of pure‐level and mixed‐level orthogonal arrays (2009, background): “two-level designs with run-sizes up to 128 [2], or three-level designs with runsizes up to 729 [28].”
Uniform fractional factorial designs (2012, methodology): “For n = 4 to 13 columns, we evaluate average CD values for the existing regular minimum aberration designs [see Xu (2005)] and compare with the CD values of the best designs listed on the UD homepage.”
Space-Filling Fractional Factorial Designs (2014, methodology): “…the relationship between the maximin distance criterion and uniformity, we further conduct all level permutations for MA 81-run designs from Xu (2005) for n = 5–18 and obtain both maximin distance design and minimum CD design for each n. Table 3 compares their ranks and percentages of the…”
Connections Among Different Criteria for Asymmetrical Fractional Factorial Designs (2006, background): “For symmetrical FFDs, the linear combination relationship between the Ai(D)’s and the Mi(D)’s had been thoroughly presented in several papers, such as Xu (2003, 2005).”