Behavioural adjustments for a life in the city

By D. Sol, O. Lapiedra, César González-Lagos. 2013

693 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Small Animals

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/297cdac249643c5e38454d159b871e8449e4a72b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Small Animals

Citations in the corpus

Risk-taking behavior, urbanization and the pace of life in birds (2018, background): “…has for instance documented that animals living in urban environments differ in behaviors related to resource use, disturbance avoidance, and communication from those inhabiting little urbanized environments (reviewed in Shochat et al. 2006; Evans et al. 2012; Lowry et al. 2013; Sol et al. 2013).”
Plastic animals in cages: behavioural flexibility and responses to captivity (2013, background): “…or even thrive and become invasive (e.g. Fisher & Owens 2004; Jeschke & Strayer 2006; Blackburn et al. 2009; Sih et al. 2011; Tuomainen & Candolin 2011; Van Dyck 2012; Sol et al. 2013): HIREC is reducing the number of species on the planet and modifying the phenotypes of populations that persist.”
Behavior Change in Urban Mammals: A Systematic Review (2020, background): “Taxonomic Focus Althoughmammals are an underrepresented taxonomic group in urban wildlife research, our review indicates a greater variety of mammalian species are being studied (n = 45) as compared to previous reviews (Ditchkoff et al., 2006; Miranda et al., 2013; Sol et al., 2013; McDonnell and Ha”
Understanding variation in behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change: a conceptual overview (2013, background): “Indeed, animals with larger brains that might often be more behaviourally flexible or even innovative appear to adjust better to HIREC in the sense of being more likely to become invasive or urbanized (Sol et al. 2005, 2013).”
Should we consider individual behavior differences in applied wildlife conservation studies (2017, background): “Bold, aggressive, exploratory individuals have reduced neophobia to objects and food and are more likely to tolerate anthropogenic disturbances, move through human-modified landscapes, and colonize new areas (Duckworth and Badyaev, 2007; Sol et al., 2013; Tuomainen and Candolin, 2011).”
The Implications of Primate Behavioral Flexibility for Sustainable Human–Primate Coexistence in Anthropogenic Habitats (2017, result): “While behavioral adjustments included reports of differences between primates in anthropogenic habitats compared to those in less humanimpacted ones, we refer to these behavioral differences as adjustments for consistency with the wider literature (Sol et al. 2013; Wong and Candolin 2015).”
The comparative biology of environmental stress: behavioural endocrinology and variation in ability to cope with novel, changing environments (2013, background): “How organisms respond to a changing environment is an emerging problem that is becoming a greater focus of basic research, especially in the light of global change (reviewed in Visser 2008; reviewed in this issue: Sih 2013; Slabbekoorn 2013; Sol et al. 2013).”
Growing in Cities: An Urban Penalty for Wild Birds? A Study of Phenotypic Differences between Urban and Rural Great Tit Chicks (Parus major) (2017, neutral): “Comparative studies have allowed ecologists to determine the specific characteristics that may be compatible with an urban way of life in wild vertebrates (Møller, 2008, 2009; Evans et al., 2011; Sol et al., 2013; Jokimäki et al., 2016).”