Filterbank-based fingerprint matching

By Anil K. Jain, Salil Prabhakar, Lin Hong, Sharath Pankanti. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2000

1,249 citations recorded by the source corpus.

With identity fraud in our society reaching unprecedented proportions and with an increasing emphasis on the emerging automatic personal identification applications, biometrics-based verification, especially fingerprint-based identification, is receiving a lot of attention. There are two major shortcomings of the traditional approaches to fingerprint representation. For a considerable fraction of population, the representations based on explicit detection of complete ridge structures in the fingerprint are difficult to extract automatically. The widely used minutiae-based representation does not utilize a significant component of the rich discriminatory information available in the fingerprints. Local ridge structures cannot be completely characterized by minutiae. Further, minutiae-based matching has difficulty in quickly matching two fingerprint images containing a different number of unregistered minutiae points. The proposed filter-based algorithm uses a bank of Gabor filters to capture both local and global details in a fingerprint as a compact fixed length FingerCode. The fingerprint matching is based on the Euclidean distance between the two corresponding FingerCodes and hence is extremely fast. We are able to achieve a verification accuracy which is only marginally inferior to the best results of minutiae-based algorithms published in the open literature. Our system performs better than a state-of-the-art minutiae-based system when the performance requirement of the application system does not demand a very low false acceptance rate. Finally, we show that the matching performance can be improved by combining the decisions of the matchers based on complementary (minutiae-based and filter-based) fingerprint information.

Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Safety Research, Signal Processing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2978a9ec41ac0b900cd84dcf9b7bd2a8fabe2f3b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. David Dapeng Zhang
  2. Anil K. Jain
  3. Adams Wai-Kin Kong
  4. Mohamed S. Kamel
  5. Tien-Ping Tan
  6. Jie Zhou
  7. Yunhong Wang
  8. Ajay Kumar

In Safety Research

  1. Chunyu Yang
  2. Jinwei Gu
  3. Jie Zhou
  4. Anil K. Jain
  5. Ephraim Nissan
  6. Suneeta Agarwal
  7. Shankar Bhausaheb Nikam
  8. Marius Tico

In Signal Processing

  1. David Dapeng Zhang
  2. Anil K. Jain
  3. Adams Wai-Kin Kong
  4. Tien-Ping Tan
  5. Mohamed S. Kamel
  6. Ajay Kumar
  7. Arun A. Ross
  8. Jie Zhou

Citations in the corpus