Applying extinction research and theory to cue-exposure addiction treatments.
By C. Conklin, Stephen Tiffany. Addiction, 2002
694 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29712c94993e7d3e08a766fe87c77302a80c16e5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Wilhelm Hofmann
- Thomas E. Gladwin
- Richard Ridderinkhof
- E. Salemink
- Reinout W. Wiers
- C. Sanchis‐Segura
- R. Spanagel
- Alan W. Stacy
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- REVIEW: Behavioural assessment of drug reinforcement and addictive features in rodents: an overview (2006, background): “This supposes a reduction of the face validity of these procedures, since rarely do humans undergo extinction (for a more detailed discussion of this topic see Conklin & Tiffany 2002 and the correspondence generated by this review).”
- Cognitive Bias Modification and Cognitive Control Training in Addiction and Related Psychopathology (2013, background): “…negative findings with extinction (Van Gucht et al., 2010; Van Gucht, Vansteenwegen, Beckers, & Van den Bergh, 2008) and cue exposure in addiction (Conklin & Tiffany, 2002; Marissen, Franken, Blanken, van den Brink, & Hendriks, 2007).3 A related CBM training used frequently in anxiety and…”
- Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behaviors in adolescents: a review and a model. (2007, background): “However, we do not know of studies testing it in adolescents and studies in adults have not been very successful from a clinical perspective (Conklin and Tiffany, 2002; Havermans and Jansen, 2003).”