The Market for Preferences
By Peter E. Earl, Jason Potts. 2004
112 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2947e3dd2f209c9af09a086dc078f03f2778e9db
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Jason Potts
- John Foster
- Stuart Cunningham
- John Hartley
- Ron Martin
- P. Sunley
- J. Stanley Metcalfe
- Ron A. Boschma
Citations in the corpus
- Social network markets: a new definition of the creative industries (2008, background): “2 See, for example, Roodhouse (2001), Florida (2002), Garnham (2005), Hartley (2005: 26–31). 3 See Beinhocker (2006) and Foster (2006).”
- From simplistic to complex systems in economics (2005, background): “What complex systems theory tells us is that it is more useful to regard the supply side, not as a set of production functions but as a system of interconnecting networks and, equally, the demand side as a network of interconnecting consumption patterns (Earl and Potts (2004)) 12 .”
- Micro-meso-macro (2004, unknown): “a way of satisfying a latent demand ( Earl and Potts, forthcoming ).”
- New market creation through transformation (2005, unknown): “In other words, every new member who actually comes on board either re-shapes the market to the extent they can persuade others to change their views or re-shapes their own preferences to the extent they are docile toward the views of the others (Akerlof and Kranton, 2005; Earl and Potts, 2004).”
- The economic agent as rule maker and rule user: Homo Sapiens Oeconomicus (2004, unknown): “Considering the significance and possible explanatory power of the concept, it is surprising how little attention the branch of a so-defined meso-economics has received up to now. ( Dopfer et al., forthcoming ).”
- Economics of Blockchain (2016, unknown): “The reputation score can increase in two ways: (1) by making a contribution that is perceived as valuable by the community; and (2) by making a useful evaluation of someone else’s contribution, that is in line with the community’s value system (Earl and Potts 2004).”