The enemy release hypothesis as a hierarchy of hypotheses
By Tina Heger, Jonathan M. Jeschke. 2014
176 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29407f35f2a672ad0ccb8d2efbbf41d280a26f76
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Jonathan M. Jeschke
- J. Vitule
- R. R. Braga
- Michael J. Wingfield
- B. Slippers
- Gabriel Augusto Nocera
- F. A. Frehse
- J. Garnas
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Jonathan M. Jeschke
- J. Vitule
- R. R. Braga
- Gabriel Augusto Nocera
- F. A. Frehse
- L. Gómez‐Aparicio
- Tina Heger
- Alain Roques
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Jonathan M. Jeschke
- J. Vitule
- R. R. Braga
- Gabriel Augusto Nocera
- F. A. Frehse
- L. Gómez‐Aparicio
- Tina Heger
- Alain Roques
Citations in the corpus
- Non-native species and invasion biology in a megadiverse country: scientometric analysis and ecological interactions in Brazil (2016, methodology): “We obtained information concerning the introduction causes from the I3N Brazil Invasive Alien Species Database (I3N 2016), or from the paper itself when provided, or from other references about the species.”
- General hypotheses in invasion ecology (2014, methodology): “According to the enemy release hypothesis, the absence of enemies in the exotic range is a cause of invasion success (Maron & Vil a, 2001; Keane & Crawley, 2002; Jeschke et al., 2012a,b; Heger & Jeschke, 2014).”
- Complex patterns of global spread in invasive insects: eco-evolutionary and management consequences (2016, background): “The Enemy Release Hypothesis is a central and wellsupported (if partial) explanation of the success of invasive species (Roy and Lawson Handley 2012; Heger and Jeschke 2014).”
- Structuring evidence for invasional meltdown: broad support but with biases and gaps (2018, methodology): “We thus weighted studies according to these aspects, adapting the formula suggested by Heger and Jeschke (2014) for study weight w: w ¼ m ffiffiffi n p i j; where, m is a score for the research method (1 for observational enclosure studies, 2 for observational field studies or experimental…”