The relative importance of shading and nutrients on algal production in subtropical streams

By Thorsten D. Mosisch, Stuart E. Bunn, P. Davies. 2001

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/291857144d8b8e90a3de2d31ec576b6e2167d0ce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. W. Dodds
2. L. Johnson
3. J. Tank
4. A. Villeneuve
5. Agnès Bouchez
6. W. Hill
7. B. Montuelle
8. S. E. Fanta

In Environmental Chemistry

1. L. Johnson
2. W. Dodds
3. J. Tank
4. Agnès Bouchez
5. W. Hill
6. S. E. Fanta

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. W. Dodds
2. L. Johnson
3. J. Tank
4. Agnès Bouchez

Citations in the corpus

• The influence of land use on stream biofilm nutrient limitation across eight North American ecoregions (2009, background): “2001; Bernhardt and Likens 2004) and nutrient response (Hepinstall and Fuller 1994; Larned and Santos 2000; Mosisch et al. 2001).”
• Influence of slight differences in environmental conditions (light, hydrodynamics) on the structure and function of periphyton (2009, background): “Primary production is also affected (Mosisch et al. 2001), which could modify carbon fluxes to the trophic network (Dodds et al.”
• Phosphorus and light colimit periphyton growth at subsaturating irradiances (2007, background): “Although several stream experiments have failed to find nutrient limitation at low light intensities (e.g. Lowe et al., 1986; Hill & Knight, 1988; Mosisch et al., 2001), the results of this study suggest that light and nutrients can complement each other, with one resource facilitating the…”