Electron performance measurements with the ATLAS detector using the 2010 LHC proton-proton collision data
By G. Aad, B. Abbott, J. Abdallah, A. Abdelalim, A. Abdesselam, O. Abdinov, B. Abi, M. Abolins, H. Abramowicz, H. Abreu and 489 more. 2011
542 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Detailed measurements of the electron performance of the ATLAS detector at the LHC are reported, using decays of the Z, W and J/psi particles. Data collected in 2010 at sqrt(s)=7 TeV are used, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of almost 40 pb^-1. The inter-alignment of the inner detector and the electromagnetic calorimeter, the determination of the electron energy scale and resolution, and the performance in terms of response uniformity and linearity are discussed. The electron identification, reconstruction and trigger efficiencies, as well as the charge misidentification probability, are also presented.
Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2915daa42510c7255114c75223f501de8c07b64c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Atlas Collaboration
- Cms Collaboration
- S. Zambito
- Alan J. Barr
- Christopher Gorham Lester
- Kyle Cranmer
- J. Brau
- G. Polesello
Citations in the corpus
- Search for squarks and gluinos with the ATLAS detector in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum using 4.7 fb⁻¹ of sqrts=7 TeV proton-pro collision data (2012, unknown): “[54] ATLAS Collaboration, Electron performance measurements with the ATLAS detector using the 2010 LHC proton-proton collision data, Eur.”
- Measurements of the properties of the Higgs-like boson in the four lepton decay channel with the ATLAS detector using 25 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data (2013, unknown): “Definition of electron discriminating variables [22].”
- Measurement of the Z/ѵ* boson transverse momentum distribution in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector (2014, methodology): “The energy resolution and scale corrections are obtained comparing the lepton pair invariant mass distribution in data and simulation [43, 44].”
- Measurement of the inclusive W+- and Z/gamma cross sections in the electron and muon decay channels in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector (2011, methodology): “Where possible, efficiencies in data and MC are derived from Z→ `` and, in the case of the electron channel, W → eν events [3, 4].”
- Electron reconstruction and identification efficiency measurements with the ATLAS detector using the 2011 LHC proton–proton collision data (2014, methodology): “[7], which were designed mostly for robustness at the startup of the LHC machine with low-luminosity conditions.”
- Search for dark matter candidates and large extra dimensions in events with a jet and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector (2012, methodology): “A CR-electron is required to pass the tight [56] electron shower shape and track selection criteria in W → eν control regions.”
- Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC (2012, unknown): “…candidates must have a well-reconstructed ID track pointing to an electromagnetic calorimeter cluster and the cluster should satisfy a set of identification criteria [85] that require the longitudinal and transverse shower profiles to be consistent with those expected for electromagnetic showers.”
- Search for charginos nearly mass degenerate with the lightest neutralino based on a disappearing-track signature in pp collisions at √(s) = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector (2013, unknown): “[22], and transverse energy, ET > 10 GeV, and |η| < 2.”
- Electron efficiency measurements with the ATLAS detector using 2012 LHC proton–proton collision data (2016, unknown): “[13], the difference between identification efficiencies in data and MC simulation can be traced back to differences in the distribution of the variables used in the identification, particularly the shower shape variables and the TRT high-threshold hit ratio FHT, the latter being defined only for |η”