The Meaning of Property Rights: Law versus Economics?
By D. Cole, P. Grossman. 2002
158 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Law, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29125779ceb98c8c2a4d26a28867d1735986ff38
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Law
In Soil Science
Citations in the corpus
- Taking Institutions Seriously: Using the IAD Framework to Analyze Fisheries Policy (2005, background): “Economic, legal, and policy scholars often differ in their conceptions of property rights (Cole and Grossman 2002).”
- Organising land information for sustainable land administration (2008, background): “Hohfeld’s jural relations suggest that in order to establish a right, liberty, power or immunity one must be able to identify, respectively, the corresponding duty, restriction, liability or disability that someone else possesses.”
- Incentive-based Approaches to Sustainable Fisheries (2006, background): “The key to IAFs is to provide harvesters with long-term and secure rights (Hannesson 2004) that are legally enforceable, along with corresponding duties by nonowners to not interfere with these rights (Cole and Grossman 2002).”
- Much of the ‘economics of property rights’ devalues property and legal rights (2015, methodology): “3 Other writers have pointed to the significance of the distinction between property and possession for the functioning of an economy based on private ownership (Cole and Grossman, 2002; De Soto, 2000; Heinsohn and Steiger, 2013; Hoffman, 2013; Pipes, 1999; Steiger, 2008).”
- Abdicating responsibility: the deceits of fisheries policy. (2009, unknown): ““The key to IAFs [inventive-based approaches to sustainable fisheries] is to provide harvesters with long-term secure rights (Hannesson 2004) that are legally enforceable, along with corresponding duties by nonowners to not interfere with these rights (Cole and Grossman 2002).”