Towards understanding the organisation of metacommunities in highly dynamic ecological systems

By T. Datry, N. Bonada, J. Heino. 2016

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/291162ecd58642b421a755005293e4537d9a949c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Julian D. Olden
2. J. Heino
3. N. LeRoy Poff
4. J. Soininen
5. C. Leigh
6. N. Bonada
7. T. Datry
8. D. Finn

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Julian D. Olden
2. J. Heino
3. N. LeRoy Poff
4. J. Soininen
5. N. Bonada
6. T. Datry
7. C. Leigh
8. D. Finn

Citations in the corpus

• The three Rs of river ecosystem resilience: Resources, recruitment, and refugia (2019, background): “, by drift), with out‐of‐channel dispersal by air across river reaches and drainage divides being associated with more similar communities among rivers at the landscape scale (Datry et al., 2016; Leigh & Datry, 2017).”
• The role of dispersal in river network metacommunities: Patterns, processes, and pathways (2018, background): “Under moderately harsh mesic environmental conditions they found that metacommunity 437 structuring of fish was best explained by watercourse distances, wh reas that of invertebrates 438 was best explained by overland distance (Datry et al., 2016b).”