Institutional Quality and Income Distribution
By Alberto Chong, C. Calderón. Economic development and cultural change, 2000
296 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2909ee9036102dad4de0361903b53ffc22e407ad
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Muhammad Shahbaz
- N. Apergis
- James E. Payne
- Ilhan Ozturk
- M. Ibrahim
- S. Law
- W. Azman-Saini
- Mehdi Ben Jebli
In Sociology and Political Science
- W. Azman-Saini
- M. Ibrahim
- L. Perera
- S. Law
- C. Ramlogan-Dobson
- Stéphane Straub
- James E. Payne
- G. Perry
Citations in the corpus
- Institutional quality thresholds and the finance Growth nexus. (2013, methodology): “Hence, the Hansen (2000) and Caner and Hansen (2004) cross-section threshold approaches which can handle dynamic estimation are employed; (ii) institutions are deep factors and usually move slowly and thus their observed variation from year to year may be rather small (Chong and Calderon, 2000).”
- International Remittances and Income Inequality: An Empirical Investigation (2006, unknown): “The control variables to be used in our regressions follow the broad literature that estimates the determinants of income inequality in cross‐country set ups (Deininger and Squire, 1997 ; Calderon and Chong, 2000 , Calderon et al, 2006 ; and others 8 ).”
- External sector and income inequality in interdependent economies using a dynamic panel data approach (2001, unknown): “Our results confirm that schooling appears to reduce income ´inequality (Chong and Calderon, 2000; Squire, 1998).”
- The relationship between corruption and income inequality in U.S. states: evidence from a panel cointegration and error correction model (2010, methodology): “(2000), Chong and Calderón (2000), Gupta et al. (2002), Chong and Gradstein (2007), and Dincer and Gunalp (2008).”
- Poverty Reduction and Growth: Virtuous and Vicious Circles (2006, background): “[+] at earlier stages and [−] at later stages of development: Chong and Calderón (2000); Li, Xu, and Zou (2000)”
- Trade Openness, Capital Flows and Financial Development in Developing Economies (2009, methodology): “Numerous studies have employed this data set in the empirical analysis, among others Knack and Keefer (1995), Easterly and Levine (1997), Hall and Jones (1999), Chong and Calderon (2000), and Clarke (2001).”
- Have Economic Growth And Institutional Quality Contributed To Poverty And Inequality Reduction In Asia (2013, methodology): “This current study uses five subjective measures of institutions, in line with studies by Chong and Caldéron [19, 14], Chong and Gradstein [15], Hasan et al.”
- Empirical Determinants of Good Institutions: Do We Know Anything? (2000, background): “Moreover, most studies have proceeded by combining as independent explanatory variables both objective or “hard” data such as economic aggregate, share of imports to GDP or wage ratios, and subjective data in the form of polls and responses to surveys.”
- Is Corruption Really Bad for Inequality? Evidence from Latin America (2011, methodology): “Thus, if the main reason for going informal is the lack of services (Dabla-Norris et al., 2005), formalisation will allow business to take advantages of all such services which can lead to increased productivity and efficiency, business expansion, job creation and declining levels of inequality. Som”
- Inequality, Democracy, and Persistence: Is There a Political Kuznets Curve? (2001, unknown): “Since endogeneity in the regressors is a concern (Przeworski and Limongi, 1993), I follow Barro (1996), Chong and Calderón (2000), and others, and instrument the Polity III and Freedom House variables with measures of political democracy in 1960 (Bollen, 1990) and law origin indicators.”