Developing mixed methods research in sport and exercise psychology: critical reflections on five points of controversy.

By A. Sparkes. 2015

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Health Professions, Physiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2904d35022f3626cb656418ccdcc897e3d6343fa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Kerry R. McGannon
2. Brett W. Smith
3. K. Douglas
4. D. Carless
5. N. Ronkainen

In General Health Professions

1. Brett W. Smith
2. Kerry R. McGannon

In Physiology

1. Brett W. Smith
2. Kerry R. McGannon

Citations in the corpus

• Developing rigor in qualitative research: problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology (2017, background): “matic assumptions in mixed methods research (Gibson, 2016; McGannon & Schweinbenz, 2011; Sparkes, 2015), the cherry picking of grounded theory techniques along with a failure to demonstrate the commonalities and variants of grounded theory in work”