Practical trigger-action programming in the smart home

By Blase Ur, Elyse McManus, Melwyn Pak Yong Ho, Michael L. Littman. International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2014

426 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29039350ed46383cc5570bc9274f63153b7f8678

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

1. Amir Rahmati
2. Earlence Fernandes
3. Z. Morley Mao
4. Qi Alfred Chen
5. Atul Prakash
6. Shiqi Wang

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Earlence Fernandes
2. Z. Morley Mao
3. Shiqi Wang

Citations in the corpus

• Security Analysis of Emerging Smart Home Applications (2016, background): “Event-driven processing is common in smart home applications [30], and SmartThings provides ways for apps to register callbacks for a given event stream generated by a device.”
• ContexloT: Towards Providing Contextual Integrity to Appified IoT Platforms (2017, background): “Wijesekera et al. suggested the systems to learn about their users’ privacy preferences and only confront users with consent dialogs when a permission request is unexpected for the user [64].”
• IFTTT vs. Zapier: A Comparative Study of Trigger-Action Programming Frameworks (2017, positive): “Given their simplicity and effectiveness, the research community has explored various facets of these models [4–6 These frameworks allow users to achieve such automation using the channel abstraction.”