Towards a consistent approach for ecosystem accounting

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

National Accounting and the Valuation of Ecosystem Assets and Their Services (2015, background): “While the release of the SEEA documents is an important milestone for the national accounting approach, there remain a number of challenges in integrating measures of ecosystem assets and services into the standard national accounts (see for example,Mäler et al. 2009; Campos and Caparrós 2011; Banzh”
A review of limitations of GDP and alternative indices to monitor human wellbeing and to manage eco-system functionality (2015, background): “, 2012), methodological challenges to ecosystem accounting (Edens and Hein, 2013), and potential economic results (Bhattacharyya and Hodler, 2014) without a longitudinal application of these methods for long periods.”
Monetary accounting of ecosystem services: a test case for Limburg province, the Netherlands. (2015, methodology): “There has been steady progress in conceptualizing ecosystem accounting in recent years, yet, considerable challenges remain (e.g. Boyd and Banzhaf, 2007; Edens and Hein, 2013; Schröter et al., 2014a; Stoneham et al., 2012; UK NEA, 2011; Weber, 2011).”
Ecosystem services assessment: A review under an ecological-economic and systems perspective (2014, background): “Farley (2008) suggests that monetary valuation could be used to help allocation decisions between conservation and conversion when the stocks of natural capital are healthy and resilient.”