Evaporation from sparse crops‐an energy combination theory

By W. Shuttleworth, J. Wallace. 2007

1,374 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/28d11340612e1de3b2b87c7db77d73e322b9e39a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Latent heat flux over Cabernet Sauvignon vineyard using the Shuttleworth and Wallace model (2006, methodology): “Surface resistances regulate the heat and mass transfer on plant and soil surfaces, and aerodynamic resistances regulate those between the surface and the atmospheric boundary layer ( Shuttleworth and Wallace 1985 ):”
Estimating zero-plane displacement height and aerodynamic roughness length using synthesis of LiDAR and SPOT-5 data (2011, background): “…for 0≤ X ≤ 0:2 0:2 b X ≤ 2 ð4Þ where X=0.2LAI, h is the height of the vegetation, and z0s is the soil surface roughness, generally taken as 0.01 m or 0.1 of the height of the vegetation understory, for raw and vegetated substrates respectively (Shuttleworth & Wallace, 1985; Yang & Friedl, 2003).”
Two-source energy balance model estimates of evapotranspiration using component and composite surface temperatures☆ (2012, methodology): “Several studies have applied the Shuttleworth and Wallace [15] approach to model the soil and canopy energy budgets separately (e.g. [8,12,21,22]); however, these often used detailed measurements of micrometeorological variables in the soil, canopy, and boundary layer space, which are not routinely ”
Principles of Environmental Physics: Plants, Animals, and the Atmosphere (2013, methodology): “An attempt to solve the heat balance equations for a canopy and soil divided into four discrete layers was described by Choudhury and Monteith (1988), and similar approaches have been used to estimate evaporation from sparse canopies (Shuttleworth and Wallace, 1985).”
Evaluation of the impact of surface residue cover on single and dual crop coefficient for estimating soybean actual evapotranspiration (2012, methodology): “These approaches include multilayer Penman–Monteith-type methods (Shuttleworth and Wallace, 1985; Shuttleworth and Gurney, 1990; Choudhury and Monteith, 1988; Norman et al., 1995; Kustas and Norman, 1999; Gardiol et al., 2003; Lagos et al., 2009; Guan and Wilson, 2009) and the dual crop coefficient ”
Crop coefficient and evapotranspiration of grain maize modified by planting density in an arid region of northwest China (2014, neutral): “…et al., 2013; Priestley and Taylor, 1972), Penman–Monteith method (Agam et al., 2010; Monteith, 1965; Utset et al., 2004), Shuttleworth–Wallace method (Shuttleworth and Wallace, 1985; Teh et al., 2001), and Clumping method (Brenner and Incoll, 1997; Domingo et al., 1999; Zhang et al., 2008) are…”
Multi‐model ensemble prediction of terrestrial evapotranspiration across north China using Bayesian model averaging (2016, methodology): “The canopy resistance rcs was calculated following Equation 3, while the three aerodynamic resistance (i.e. raa, r c a, and r s a) were computed as reported by Shuttleworth and Wallace (1985) and Shuttleworth and Gurney (1990).”
Hydrologic regulation of plant rooting depth (2017, methodology): “Shuttleworth WJ, Wallace JS (1985) Evaporation from sparse crops–”
Comparison of dual crop coefficient method and Shuttleworth–Wallace model in evapotranspiration partitioning in a vineyard of northwest China (2015, methodology): “However, these techniques are often expensive and require specific equipments, thus they are limited in agricultural water management, so the estimating E and T respectively with models has been done by many researchers (Ritchie, 1972; Shuttleworth and Wallace, 1985; Lascano et al., 1987; Allen et a”
Crop Evapotranspiration (ET) Estimation Models: A Review and Discussion of the Applicability and Limitations of ET Methods (2015, positive): “Shuttleworth and Wallace (1985) developed a two layer ET model, which could incorporate evaporation from the ground surfaces as well as the transpiration from the plant canopy.”
Modelling the dynamics of the evapotranspiration process using genetic programming (2007, background): “The complexity of the model varies depending upon the uniformity of the surface, canopy properties, and baseline assumptions (see Shuttleworth & Wallace, 1985; Choudhury & Monteith, 1988; Granger & Gray, 1989; Flerchinger et al., 1996; Biftu & Gan, 2000).”
SPEI-Based Approach to Agricultural Drought Monitoring in Vojvodina Region (2019, methodology): “Based on the research over the Loess Plateau in China, Zhang et al. [29] recommend using the two-source potential evapotranspiration model (2S PET) [30] as the first choice, and the PM equation as the second choice for the calculation of the SPEI.”