Sectoral Analysis of the Causal Relationship Between Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption and Real Output in the US

292 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Renewable energy, nonrenewable energy consumption, and economic growth (2017, methodology): “In a sectoral analysis of renewable energy consumption, Bowden and Payne (2010) explored Toda-Yamamoto causality test long run from 1949 to 2006 in the United States to examine the causal link between nonrenewable sector/renewable energy consumption and real GDP.”
Renewable energy, oil prices, and economic activity: A Granger-causality in quantiles analysis (2018, background): “Based on country-specific studies, Sari and Soytas (2004), Ewing et al. (2007), Sari et al. (2008), Payne (2009; 2011), and Bowden and Payne (2010), among others, have found mixed results on the causality be ween renewable energy consumption and economic growth.”
Environmental Kuznets Curve in Romania and the Role of Energy Consumption (2011, unknown): “For instance Paul and Bhattacharya [32], Ho and Siu [33], Bowden and Payne [34], and Nasir and Rehman [25] have concluded that high economic growth is linked with high energy consumption which may increase the environmental degradation.”
Renewable Energy and Economic Growth: Evidence from the Sign of Panel Long-Run Causality (2014, background): “In a sectoral analysis of renewable energy consumption, Bowden and Payne (2010) show unidirectional causality from residential renewable energy consumption to real output while the absence of a causal relationship between commercial and industrial renewable energy consumption and real output,…”