Acceptance of chronic pain: component analysis and a revised assessment method
By L. McCracken, K. Vowles, C. Eccleston. Pain, 2004
1,147 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/28d0ef7f308013d14151d695831cfc24f32cf7bc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Pharmacology
Citations in the corpus
- Substance abuse and psychological flexibility: The development of a new measure (2011, methodology): “We reviewed the naming conventions embraced by papers detailing the analysis of other content-specific versions of the AAQ (McCracken et al., 2004; Westin et al., 2008) and considered the items in respect to the processes theorized in ACT treatment (Hayes et al., 2006).”
- Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. (2006, methodology): “A specific pain-related version of the AAQ has also been widely used that is based on a rewriting of the AAQ items to focus on pain content: the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ; McCracken, 1998; McCracken, Vowles, & Eccleston, 2004).”
- Relational frame theory, acceptance and commitment therapy, and a functional analytic definition of mindfulness (2005, methodology): “McCracken, Vowles, & Eccleston (2004) treated chronic pain patients in an inpatient setting using a three to four week protocol based on ACT.”
- Acceptance‐based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: A systematic review and meta‐analysis (2011, positive): “However, given the important role acceptance and mindfulness play in adaptation to chronic pain [39,41,42], the development of more effective therapies is warranted.”