Coordination of Energy Efficiency and Demand Response

By C. Goldman. 2010

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches to energy demand-side response: A systematic review (2020, background): “3, DR schemes can be partitioned into two classes [9,26,27].”
A survey and taxonomy on energy efficient resource allocation techniques for cloud computing systems (2016, background): “Thermal-aware management predicts the thermal effects of a task placement and the resource allocation is based on the predicted thermal effect [30,58].”
Demand Response for Ancillary Services (2013, background): “programs are usually limited to 10–15 calls per year, each lasting 4–8 hours [17].”
Coupon Incentive-Based Demand Response: Theory and Case Study (2013, background): “In the case of ERCOT, it is 60 min [37], whereas it is 75 min in California ISO [38].”
Social implications of residential demand response in cool temperate climates (2012, background): “Some researchers have made a case for bringing together efficiency and demand response as a ‘package’ for users (York and Kushler, 2005; Goldman et al., 2010).”
Optimal Generation Mix With Short-Term Demand Response and Wind Penetration (2012, background): “Because this impact of efficiency expenditures upon price elasticities has only been discussed qualitatively [28], we arbitrarily assume a value of of 0.”