Measuring Multidimensional Poverty: An Empirical Comparison of Various Approaches

By J. Deutsch, Jacques Silber. 2005

373 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2889b471edb7a3731adc838a038a588a52505e38

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Safety Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Weights in Multidimensional Indices of Wellbeing: An Overview (2013, neutral): “(forthcoming), Deutsch and Silber (2005), Maasoumi and Lugo (2008), Osberg and Sharpe (2002).”
Multidimensional Measurement of Poverty Among Women in Sub-Saharan Africa (2013, neutral): “…(Cerioli and Zani 1990; Cheli and Lemmi 1994; Chiappero-Martinetti 2006), the distance function method (Lovell, Richardson, Travers, and Wood 1994; Anderson et al. 2008; Deutsch and Silber 2005) and the entropy measures approach (Maasoumi 1993; Deutsch and Silber 2005; Maasoumi and Lugo 2008).”
Dynamics of Multidimensional Poverty and Uni-dimensional Income Poverty: An Evidence of Stability Analysis from China (2019, background): “Deutsch and Silber (2005) made a systematic comparison of four approaches to multidimensional poverty analysis based respectively on the theory of fuzzy sets, information theory, efficiency analysis and axiomatic poverty indices.”
Multidimensional Poverty Analysis : Looking for a Middle Ground (2012, background): “This rapidly growing literature now includes Alkire and Foster (2011a), Chakravarty, Deutsch, and Silber (2008), Deutsch and Silber (2005), Duclos, Sahn, and Younger (2006), and Maasoumi and Lugo (2008), among others.”
Poverty and social exclusion: two sides of the same coin or dynamically interrelated processes? (2011, methodology): “Following the guidance offered by the recent literature (Brandolini and D’Alessio, 1998; Deutsch and Silber, 2005; Poggi, 2007a), and taking into account the actual information available in the ECHP, we select six relevant dimensions to capture all the principal aspects of social exclusion (Table…”
Multidimensional poverty and inequality (2014, neutral): “Several authors apply latent variable models or structural equation modelling to collapse multiple indicators into indices of total or domain-specific deprivation (Kuklys, 2005; Pérez-Mayo, 2005, 2007; Di Tommaso, 2007; Krishnakumar, 2008; Krishnakumar and Ballon (2008); Krishnakumar and Nagar (2008”
On Synthetic Indices Of Multidimensional Well-Being: Health And Income Inequalities In France, Germany, Italy And The United Kingdom (2007, methodology): “The same observation applies to methods developed in efficiency analysis (Lovell et al., 1994; Cherchye et al., 2004; Deutsch and Silber, 2005; Ramos and Silber, 2005).”
Understandings and misunderstandings of multidimensional poverty measurement (2011, background): “1 The literature is growing rapidly; some key papers in the axiomatic tradition include Anand and Sen [12], Brandolini and D’Alessio [21], Chakravarty et al. [24], Tsui [47], Atkinson [17], Bourguignon and Chakravarty [20], Deutsch and Silber [ 26 ], Duclos et al. [27], Chakravarty and D’Ambrosio [2”