What is Conservation Science?
By P. Kareiva, M. Marvier. 2012
668 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2872ac5a7bfc6be08ac57cdebab0ea32b246fab4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- L. Hallett
- Erle C. Ellis
- J. Link
- Daniel Ramp
- James E. M. Watson
- Hugh P. Possingham
- Clifford E. Kraft
- Richard J. Hobbs
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Erle C. Ellis
- L. Hallett
- Daniel Ramp
- James E. M. Watson
- Hugh P. Possingham
- Clifford E. Kraft
- Richard J. Hobbs
- P. Levin
Citations in the corpus
- Conservation opportunities across the world's anthromes (2014, background): “The diversity of approaches presented in Table 1 reflects two tenets of conservation science (Kareiva & Marvier, 2012): first, that conservation planning should be approached through multiple strategies, and second, that humans should be considered part of ecosystems.”
- The Sixth Mass Extinction: fact, fiction or speculation? (2022, neutral): “This latter view has been expressed to a greater or lesser extent by some prominent conservationists (Kareiva & Marvier, 2007, 2012; Kar-eiva, Lalasz & Marvier, 2011; Thomas, 2017) and has become a key feature of the ‘ New Conservation ’ or ‘ Neolib-eral Conservation ’ , although the paradigm has…”
- Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation (2015, neutral): “At the same time, the ecosystem services argument for conservation is gaining considerable traction as a dominant paradigm in real-world conservation 6–8 .”
- Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management (2016, background): “Producing effective conservation actions and outcomes requires a broad view of conservation science (Kareiva & Marvier 2012; de Snoo et al. 2013; Bennett & Roth 2015).”
- Compassion as a Practical and Evolved Ethic for Conservation (2015, background): “Not only has exclusive concern for human benefits taken a strong hold of motivational mechanisms (e.g., as proposed in the new conservation; Kareiva and Marvier 2012), but the grounding of conservation in species welfare has, perhaps unintentionally, subjugated individuals for collective benefits.”
- Changing trends and persisting biases in three decades of conservation science (2017, background): “From its inception it has undergone changes in the framing of its goals and approaches (Kareiva and Marvier, 2012; Mace, 2014), but the overall purpose of increasing our understanding of what threatens biodiversity, and what actions and policies are needed to preserve it, has remained unchanged.”
- Lessons learned from developing integrated ecosystem assessments to inform marine ecosystem-based management in the USA (2014, background): “Marine ecosystems produce goods and services that sustain human life, and increasingly, modern conservation science is focused on protecting ecosystems for the benefit of humanity (Kareiva and Marvier, 2011).”