Brief Report The coherence of emotion systems: Comparing “on‐line” measures of appraisal and facial expressions, and self‐report

By G. Bonanno, Dacher Keltner. 2004

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2869314ec7ffc32e509e6abdcdbed5b8caa559f3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Measures of emotion: A review (2009, unknown): “This was the case, but such relationships were also weak and not very robust in nature (see Bonanno & Keltner, 2004, for additional results of this type).”
Are Emotions Natural Kinds? (2006, unknown): “For example, Bonanno and Keltner (2004) reported moderate to strong correspondences between facial behaviors and ratings of experience for anger and sadness, with effect sizes ranging from .34 to .52.”
The tie that binds? Coherence among emotion experience, behavior, and physiology. (2005, background): “…was not directly assessed in this study (rather, a different group of athletes was asked to remember their emotion experience in similar situations), evoking the criticism that perhaps other emotions such as awe or sadness were actually felt when winning a gold medal (Bonanno & Keltner, 2004).”
Real-time classification of evoked emotions using facial feature tracking and physiological responses (2008, background): “Amusement rather than happiness was chosen, because amusement more clearly allows predictions on which facial behaviors to expect (Bonanno and Keltner, 2004).”
Discrete emotions predict changes in cognition, judgment, experience, behavior, and physiology: a meta-analysis of experimental emotion elicitations. (2011, background): “A review of potential discrete positive emotions was not possible because few studies included more than one of these emotions (Bonanno & Keltner, 2004).”
Emotion and Expression: Naturalistic Studies (2013, background): “In a third study, Bonanno and Keltner (2004) examined correlations among emotional content (measured in terms of the emotional appraisals reflected in their discourse), self-reported emotion, and facial expressions of sadness, anger, enjoyment, and pride.”
Coherence between Emotion and Facial Expression: Evidence from Laboratory Experiments (2013, background): “…situations and codings or observer ratings of “happy” facial expressions ranged from nonsignificant (.09, Mehu, Grammer, & Dunbar, 2007; .24, Bonanno & Keltner, 2004; .31, Lee & Wagner, 2002, social condition) to moderate (.35, Keltner & Bonanno, 1997; .38, Hall & Horgan, 2003, low-power…”
Solving the Emotion Paradox: Categorization and the Experience of Emotion (2006, background): “…are found (e.g., correspondences between facial behaviors and ratings of experience for anger and sadness, with effect sizes ranging from .34 to .52; Bonanno & Keltner, 2004), alternative explanations due to differences in other properties, such as arousal or intensity, were not ruled out.”