Searching in metric spaces by spatial approximation
By Gonzalo Navarro. 1999
Subfields: Information Retrieval & Search, Algorithms & Complexity
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Retrieval & Search
- Yury Malkov
- Alexander Ponomarenko
- Eric Sadit Tellez
- Edgar Chávez
- Guillermo Ruiz
- Mario Graff
- Jingdong Wang
- Vladimir V. Krylov
In Algorithms & Complexity
- Yury Malkov
- Alexander Ponomarenko
- Edgar Chávez
- Vladimir V. Krylov
- Eric Sadit Tellez
- Andrey Logvinov
- Kenneth L. Clarkson
- Mario Graff
Citations in the corpus
- On The Marriage of Lp-norms and Edit Distance (2004, methodology): “In our experiments, we pick M-trees and OMNI-sequential as the strawman structures for comparison; MVP-trees and Sa-trees are not compared because they are main memory resident structures.”
- Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search Small World Approach (2011, methodology): “Because it is impossible to determine exact Delaunay graph [26] (excluding the variant of the complete graph) we cannot avoid the existence of local minimums.”
- Near neighbor searching with K nearest references (2015, background): “On the other hand, for sufficiently large ρ, the number of distance computations, even with the speedup of the SAT structure, becomes dominant and the search becomes slower.”
- Effective Proximity Retrieval by Ordering Permutations (2008, background): “[8], [33], a set of centers is cho en and every other point is added to the group of its closest center.”
- Searching in metric spaces (2001, methodology): “SAT The algorithm SAT (\Spatial Approximation Tree") [44] does not use pivots to split the set of candidate objects, but rather relies on \spatial" approximation.”
- Approximate nearest neighbor algorithm based on navigable small world graphs (2014, methodology): “However, there are major drawbacks associated with the Delaunay graph: it requires some knowledge of metric space internal structure [8] and it suffers from the curse of dimensionality [7].”
- Large Scale Nearest Neighbors Search Based on Neighborhood Graph (2013, methodology): “Neighborhood graph method: The neighborhood graph method organizes the data with a graph structure to connect data points, for example, Delaunay graph [20], relative neighborhood graph [21], and KNN graph [22].”
- Navigating K-Nearest Neighbor Graphs to Solve Nearest Neighbor Searches (2010, background): “The quest for a proximity graph in a general metric space was deterred when it was proved in [1] that the degree of the graph is unbounded if only the distance information is used.”
- Singleton indexes for nearest neighbor search (2016, methodology): “The legacy one by Navarro’s SAT [18] and the Distal SAT [8].”
- Rank-Based Similarity Search: Reducing the Dimensional Dependence (2015, methodology): “This has spurred the development of search structures for more general metric spaces, such as the Multi-Vantage-Point Tree [7], the Geometric Near-neighbor Access Tree (GNAT) [9], Spatial Approximation Tree (SAT) [40], the M-tree [13], and (more recently) the Cover Tree (CT) [6].”
- Nearest-Neighbor Searching and Metric Space Dimensions (2005, methodology): “In the metric-space setting, Navarro [Nav02] proposed a heuristic data structure with a similar but somewhat more complicated searching method.”
- Query-driven iterated neighborhood graph search for large scale indexing (2012, background): “Various modifications have been done over local search to kick a solution out from a local optimum.”