Intellectual property rights in the global economy

By Keith E. Maskus. 2000

499 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/285816781cfe728508b3bdd0ae9ab2fc0e355c62

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Regional collaborations and indigenous innovation capabilities in China: A multivariate method for the analysis of regional innovation systems (2015, background): “Firms generate the stimulus for technological need and contribute to the creation of wealth through their commercial activity (design, production, sale of technology) and through the exploitation of intellectual property rights (Maskus, 2000).”
Globalization and income inequality: Implications for intellectual property rights (2008, background): “As noted by Maskus (2000a) effective IPR regime has an effect not only on the incentive for new knowledge creation and its dissemination, but even more important, the market structure, prices, and distributional equity.”
Accountability in a Global Economy: The Emergence of International Accountability Standards (2011, background): “For instance, legal regulations to ensure the global protection of intellectual property rights were designed and implemented from the 80s onwards (Maskus, 2000), whereas working conditions in global supply 4 chains, including child and forced labor practices, remained largely unaddressed (Bales,…”
The role of transnational dimensions in emerging economy 'Technological Innovation Systems' for clean-tech (2015, background): “Such considerations will be part of other forms of technology transfers efforts (e.g., in TNC or GPN), and even in selecting export markets for equipment, as ‘reverse engineering’may result in knowledge spill-overs as well (Maskus, 2000).”
Openness and Technological Innovations in Developing Countries: Evidence from Firm-Level Surveys (2006, unknown): “When this is not the case, foreign firms prefer not to engage in licensing at all or if they do they tend to transfer older technology (Saggi, 1996 ; Maskus, 2000 ).”
Do National Patent Laws Stimulate Domestic Innovation in a Global Patenting Environment? A Cross-Country Analysis of Pharmaceutical Patent Protection, 19782002 (2007, background): “Interaction variables between log education and PAT, and between log economic freedom and PAT, respectively, are also included to test the hypothesis that human capital and open markets are complementary factors to patent protection in stimulating innovation (Maskus, 2000).”
Patent rights, product market reforms, and innovation (2015, background): “55 See, among others, Branstetter et al. (2006), Lerner (2000), Maskus (2000), Maskus and Penubarti (1995), Qian (2007), and World Intellectual Property Organization (2012).”
Strategic Intellectual Property Rights Policy and North-South Technology Transfer (2007, background): “Analyzing these criteria shows that IPR may indeed have a stronger case for standardization than other fields such as competition policy, environmental protection, and labor standards (Maskus 2000b).”
Intellectual monopoly in global value chains (2019, background): “The view that short term welfare costs for developing countries could be overcome by medium- to long-term dynamic gains (Maskus, 2000) has also been opposed by trade economists.”
What Drives the International Transfer of Climate Change Mitigation Technologies? Empirical Evidence from Patent Data (2012, unknown): “As argued above, lax patent system can deter the import of foreign technologies, because of the fear of counterfeiting (see, for example, Maskus, 2000; Smith, 2001; and Barton, 2007).”