Breaking eight fold degeneracies in neutrino CP violation, mixing, and mass hierarchy

By V. Barger, D. Marfatia, K. Whisnant. 2001

305 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We identify three independent twofold parameter degeneracies $(\ensuremath{\delta},{\ensuremath{\theta}}_{13}),$ $\mathrm{sgn}(\ensuremath{\delta}{m}_{31}^{2})$ and $({\ensuremath{\theta}}_{23},\ensuremath{\pi}/2\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\theta}}_{23})$ inherent in the usual three-neutrino analysis of long-baseline neutrino experiments, which can lead to as much as an eightfold degeneracy in the determination of the oscillation parameters. We discuss the implications these degeneracies have for detecting $\mathrm{CP}$ violation and present criteria for breaking them. A superbeam facility with a baseline at least as long as the distance between Fermilab and Homestake (1290 km) and a narrow band beam with energy tuned so that the measurements are performed at the first oscillation peak can resolve all the ambiguities other than the $({\ensuremath{\theta}}_{23},\ensuremath{\pi}/2\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\theta}}_{23})$ ambiguity (which can be resolved at a neutrino factory) and a residual $(\ensuremath{\delta},\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\delta})$ ambiguity. However, whether or not $\mathrm{CP}$ violation occurs in the neutrino sector can be ascertained independently of the latter two ambiguities. The $(\ensuremath{\delta},\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\delta})$ ambiguity can be eliminated by performing a second measurement to which only the $\mathrm{cos}\ensuremath{\delta}$ terms contribute. The hierarchy of mass eigenstates can be determined at other oscillation peaks only in the most optimistic conditions, making it necessary to use the first oscillation maximum. We show that the degeneracies may severely compromise the ability of the proposed SuperJHF-HyperKamiokande experiment to establish $\mathrm{CP}$ violation. In our calculations we use approximate analytic expressions for oscillation probabilitites that agree with numerical solutions with a realistic Earth density profile.

Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/28527db4c0f87a50b03fdce07f0de45b8ba1e33a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. T. Han
  2. I. Mocioiu
  3. I. Martinez-Soler
  4. Jordi Salvado
  5. I. Shoemaker
  6. A. Gouvea
  7. Mu-Chun Chen
  8. P. S. Bhupal Dev

Citations in the corpus