Does Asset Allocation Policy Explain 40, 90, or 100 Percent of Performance?
By Roger G. Ibbotson, P. Kaplan. 2000
423 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/284a61cff79629fd85cda7a8c8514fa8dbff0d30
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- K. Brown
- Heiko Jacobs
- Sebastian Müller
- Lorenzo Garlappi
- Martin Weber
- Cristian Tiu
- Harry M. Markowitz
- Raffaella Calabrese
In Economics and Econometrics
- Sebastian Müller
- K. Brown
- Heiko Jacobs
- Lorenzo Garlappi
- Martin Weber
- Cristian Tiu
- Harry M. Markowitz
- Dorota Skała
In Finance
- Sebastian Müller
- K. Brown
- Heiko Jacobs
- Lorenzo Garlappi
- Martin Weber
- Cristian Tiu
- Harry M. Markowitz
- Victor DeMiguel
Citations in the corpus
- Asset allocation and portfolio performance: Evidence from university endowment funds (2010, methodology): “14 Following the methodology of Ibbotson and Kaplan (2000) we quantify the degree to which asset allocation contributes to return variability over time, by regressing the time series of total annual returns of each fund i on each of the three return components, i.”
- Portfolio Theory: As I Still See It (2010, methodology): “It often uses a top-down approach pioneered by Brinson and colleagues (see Brinson et al. 1986, 1991; Ibbotson & Kaplan 2000; Statman 2000).”
- How Should Individual Investors Diversify? An Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Asset Allocation Policies (2014, background): “The failure of diversifying adequately over asset classes must be considered as particularly problematic as asset allocation has been shown to be the main determinant of portfolio performance (e.g., Brinson et al., 1986; Ibbotson and Kaplan, 2000).”