Exponential smoothing with a damped multiplicative trend
By James W. Taylor. 2003
316 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
- Jennifer L. Castle
- Christiane Lemke
- Rob J Hyndman
- Bogdan Gabrys
- Georgios Sermpinis
- Sven F. Crone
- J. De Gooijer
- Nikolaos Kourentzes
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Rob J Hyndman
- Pierre Pinson
- J. De Gooijer
- Christoph Bergmeir
- Thordis Linda Thorarinsdottir
- Florian Ziel
- Fotios Petropoulos
- Stephen M. Disney
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Rob J Hyndman
- Fotios Petropoulos
- Konstantinos Nikolopoulos
- Nikolaos Kourentzes
- Vassilios Assimakopoulos
- Spyros Makridakis
- Christoph Bergmeir
- Sven F. Crone
Citations in the corpus
- Meta-learning for time series forecasting and forecast combination (2010, methodology): “• Taylor’s exponential smoothing is a more recently introduced exponential smoothing algorithm with a trend dampened by a factor φ , using a multiplicative approach and a growth rate R [42].”
- Forecasting: theory and practice (2020, methodology): “Some studies have extended the classical ARIMA and Exponential Smoothing (ETS) methods to accommodate MSC. Multiple/multiplicative Seasonal ARIMA (MSARIMA) model is an extension of ARIMA for the case of MSC (Taylor, 2003b).”
- Improving forecasting by estimating time series structural components across multiple frequencies (2014, methodology): “ETS is a family of methods, designed for forecasting time series with different characteristics, covering a wide range of additive and multiplicative combinations of level, trend, seasonality and noise (Gardner, 1985; Taylor, 2003; Gardner, 2006).”
- Beyond point forecasting: evaluation of alternative prediction intervals for tourist arrivals (2011, unknown): “Building on earlier works (see, for example, Ord, Koehler, & Snyder, 1997; Hyndman, Koehler, Snyder, & Grose, 2002; and Taylor, 2003), Hyndman et al. (2008) present a comprehensive statistical framework for building state space models for exponential smoothing methods, in which prediction intervals…”
- Determination of Exponential Smoothing Constant to Minimize Mean Square Error and Mean Absolute Deviation (2011, methodology): “Taylor (2003) investigated a new damped multiplicative trend approach.”
- Forecasting Time Series With Complex Seasonal Patterns Using Exponential Smoothing (2011, methodology): “Taylor (2003) extended the linear version of the Holt–Winters method to incorporate a second seasonal component as follows: yt = t−1 + bt−1 + s(1)t + s(2)t + dt, (1a) t = t−1 + bt−1 + αdt, (1b) bt = bt−1 + βdt, (1c) s(1)t = s(1)t−m1 + γ1dt, (1d) s(2)t = s(2)t−m2 + γ2dt, (1e) where m1 and m2 are the…”
- EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING: THE STATE OF THE ART, PART II (2006, unknown): “Taylor (2003a) also obtained somewhat disconcerting results with the Gardner–McKenzie procedure.”
- Forecasting the novel coronavirus COVID-19 (2020, methodology): “We produce forecasts using models from the exponential smoothing family [5, 6].”
- Avoiding the bullwhip effect using Damped Trend forecasting and the Order-Up-To replenishment policy (2014, background): “However, both Tashman and Kruk (1996) and Taylor (2003) argue that there can be value in allowing 1 as it could be suited to time series with strong increasing trends.”
- Forecasting and operational research: a review (2008, methodology): “Taylor’s (2007) exponentially smoothed approach is shown to”
- 25 years of time series forecasting (2006, methodology): “The damped multiplicative methods of Taylor (2003) provide the only genuinely new exponential smoothing methods over this period.”
- 25 Years of IIF Time Series Forecasting: A Selective Review (2005, methodology): “The shape of the combined forecast error distribution and the corresponding stochastic behaviour was studied by de Menezes & Bunn (1998) and Taylor & Bunn (1999). For non-normal forecast error distributions skewness emerges as a relevant criterion for specifying the method of combination.”