Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

By L. Robles, M. Ruggero. Physiological Reviews, 2001

1,471 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/27e2bb990a670a6ed17e44408ac52ec322773ad6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. John J. Guinan

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. M. Liberman
2. S. Kujawa
3. Frédéric E. Theunissen
4. John J. Guinan
5. J. E. Elie
6. Sharon G. Kujawa

In Sensory Systems

1. M. Liberman
2. S. Kujawa
3. John J. Guinan
4. Sharon G. Kujawa

Citations in the corpus

• Adding Insult to Injury: Cochlear Nerve Degeneration after “Temporary” Noise-Induced Hearing Loss (2009, background): “2) is typical of acoustic injury (Cody and Johnstone, 1981) and is well explained by level-dependent nonlinearities in cochlear mechanics (Robles and Ruggero, 2001).”
• Olivocochlear Efferents: Anatomy, Physiology, Function, and the Measurement of Efferent Effects in Humans (2006, background): “…motion are at low sound levels (Cooper & Guinan, in press; Dolan, Guo, & Nuttall, 1997; Murugasu & Russell, 1996; but also see Russell and Murugasu, 1997), which is consistent with many measurements showing that cochlear amplifier gain is greatest at low sound levels (Robles & Ruggero, 2001).”
• Neural processing of natural sounds (2014, background): “Indeed, just as the Helmholtz resonator separated multi-tone sounds into its frequency components, the principal role of the auditory portion of the inner ear, the cochlea, is to decompose the sound waveform into separate frequency bands[2].”