Trade-offs in interspecific comparisons in plant ecology and how plants overcome proposed constraints

By P. Grubb. 2016

85 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/27b9d6965ec954dc5548e885b2662298ab12687d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. C. Violle
2. Brian J. McGill
3. Brian J. Enquist
4. M. Lechowicz
5. F. Fort
6. D. Vile
7. J. Messier
8. James H. Brown

In Global and Planetary Change

1. F. Fort
2. Brian J. McGill
3. D. Vile
4. Brian J. Enquist
5. J. Messier
6. C. Violle
7. M. Lechowicz
8. Jürgen Dengler

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. C. Violle
2. Brian J. Enquist
3. Brian J. McGill
4. M. Lechowicz
5. J. Messier
6. F. Fort
7. D. Vile
8. Francesco de Bello

Citations in the corpus

• Interspecific integration of trait dimensions at local scales: the plant phenotype as an integrated network (2017, background): “Trait relationships are shaped by the interplay of constraints and selection (Merila & Bjorklund 2004; Grubb 2016).”
• Shifts in plant functional strategies over the course of wheat domestication (2018, background): “, 2010; Messier, Lechowicz, McGill, Violle, & Enquist, 2017) but also trade- offs between key functions such as resource acquisition and plant defence (Grubb, 2016; Maire, Gross, Da Silveira Pontes, PiconCochard, & Soussana, 2009; Reich et al., 2003).”