Home-Field Advantage: A matter of interaction between litter biochemistry and decomposer biota
By G. Pérez, M. Aubert, T. Decaëns, J. Trap, Matthieu Chauvat. 2013
103 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/278b7fcd7ae9c6e858d3357c601855a8499dca9f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Insect Science
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Ellen L. Fry
- M. Bradford
- Richard P Phillips
- M. Strickland
- M. Midgley
- David A Keiser
- A. D. Keiser
- Paul Kardol
In Soil Science
- M. Strickland
- A. D. Keiser
- E. Brzostek
- M. Bradford
- Richard P Phillips
- M. Midgley
- David A Keiser
- Paul Kardol
Citations in the corpus
- The Role of Plant Litter in Driving Plant-Soil Feedbacks (2019, background): “, 2015) and plant-specific patterns of nutrient release (Perez et al., 2013).”
- Disentangling the mechanisms underlying functional differences among decomposer communities (2014, methodology): “Ayres et al. (2009b) also performed a meta-analysis of HFA using a novel set of equations only applicable to the more common litter transplant experiment design using two species and sites (Jacob et al. 2010; Perez et al. 2013).”
- Decay rates of leaf litters from arbuscular mycorrhizal trees are more sensitive to soil effects than litters from ectomycorrhizal trees (2015, background): “Several other studies have also found that labile litter is more responsive to changes in matrix quality than recalcitrant litters (Keiser, Knoepp & Bradford 2013; Perez et al. 2013; Wang, Zhong & He 2013), but ours is the first to clarify a mechanism driving this pattern.”