Evaluating expert judgments

By M. Steenbergen, G. Marks. 2007

361 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/278535f9d1e1c33b53ec0ca37ae569d499511bd3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Left-Authoritarians and Policy Representation in Western Europe: Electoral Choice across Ideological Dimensions (2014, methodology): “We then turn to the 2006 Chapel Hill expert survey (Hooghe et al. 2010; Steenbergen and Marks 2007) to locate parties in the same two-dimensional space.9 We place specific parties on our two dimensions of conflict by using two indexes of economic and socio-cultural positions, respectively.”
Going green: Explaining issue competition on the environment (2014, neutral): “In line with the literature, we expect the relationship to be reciprocal, that is that parties are not only influencing voters’ perceptions of issue saliency, but also responding to it (Adams et al 2004; Steenbergen et al. 2007; Adams et al 2009).”
Issue Entrepreneurship and Multiparty Competition (2015, methodology): “Consequently, we need measures of both party positions on the EU dimension and the emphasis that parties place on this dimension.6 For both position and salience measures, we rely on CHES (Hooghe et al., 2010; Ray, 1999; Steenbergen & Marks, 2007).”
Catchall or Catch and Release? The Electoral Consequences of Social Democratic Parties’ March to the Middle in Western Europe (2013, neutral): “For this reason, we also rely on the Chapel Hill Expert Survey (CHES; Bakker et al., 2012; Hooghe et al., 2010; Steenbergen & Marks, 2007) as an alternative measure.”
Reliability and validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys on party positioning (2010, background): “A detailed examination of the reliability and validity of the 1999 Chapel Hill dataset is consistent with these findings (Steenbergen & Marks 2007).”
Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage (2018, background): “Experts can plausibly be regarded as Bayesians who use party manifestos alongside other indicators, such as speeches made by party leaders, to update their judgments (Steenbergen and Marks 2007).”
Throwing Out the Bums: Protest Voting and Unorthodox Parties after Communism (2010, background): “…whether pis should be labeled national populist in 2005, i decided to do so because of its decision to join the national conservative Alliance for europe of the nations (aen) and because the university of north Carolina (unc) expert survey codes pis as radical right (steenbergen and marks 2007).”