Estimation of Interaction Potentials of Marked Spatial Point Patterns Through the Maximum Likelihood Method
By Yosihiko Ogata, M. Tanemura. 1985
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Alex Kulesza
- B. Taskar
- Adrian Baddeley
- Yoshua Bengio
- Nathan D. Ratliff
- Tamir Hazan
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Kristen Grauman
Citations in the corpus
- Determinantal Point Processes for Machine Learning (2012, methodology): “…pseudolikelihood [Besag, 1977, Besag et al., 1982, Jensen and Moller, 1991, Ripley, 1991], Markov chain Monte Carlo methods [Ripley and Kelly, 1977, Besag and Green, 1993, Häggström et al., 1999, Berthelsen and Møller, 2006], and other approximations [Ogata and Tanemura, 1985, Diggle et al., 1994].”
- Non‐ and semi‐parametric estimation of interaction in inhomogeneous point patterns (2000, methodology): “For second-order terms, ö is usually chosen to be translation invariant, while ö 1 for higher-order terms, see Ogata and Tanemura (1986), and Stoyan and Stoyan (1998). Nielsen and Jensen (2000) consider another interesting approach where smooth transformations are applied to homogeneous Markov poi”