Instrumental Variable Estimation
By Jerry A. Hausman. 2014
63 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/27624da82affdef5d70bf35210ad3699ec2d7e1c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
- Stephen Burgess
- S. Thompson
- Liangjun Su
- Dylan S. Small
- Aman Ullah
- Irina Murtazashvili
- J. Bowden
- George Davey Smith
Citations in the corpus
- Instrumental Variable Estimation with Heteroskedasticity and Many Instruments (2012, unknown): “In contrast, the asymptotic variance of LIML does depend on third and fourth moment terms for non-Gaussian disturbances; see Bekker and van der Ploeg (2005), Hansen, Hausman, and Newey (2008), and van Hasselt (2010).”
- A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization (2015, methodology): “These methods have been discussed in detail elsewhere(49,50) and implemented in Stata(51) and R.(52) We recommend the Fieller’s theorem, Anderson–Rubin, or conditional likelihood ratio approaches for obtaining causal inferences and confidence intervals in practice with a weak instrument.”
- Local Linear GMM Estimation of Functional Coefficient IV Models With an Application to Estimating the Rate of Return to Schooling (2013, methodology): “We do so by extending the work of Newey (1990, 1993), Baltagi and Li (2002), and Ai and Chen (2003) to our framework, but the latter authors only consider OIVs for GMM estimates of finite dimensional parameters based on conditional moment conditions.”