Rethinking the Emerging Post‐Washington Consensus

248 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Whims of the Winds of Time? Emerging Trends in Biodiversity Conservation and Protected Area Management (2007, background): “5. Note that many have pointed towards an emerging Post-Washington Consensus in international development thinking (see Onis and Şenses 2005 ), which posits that the ‘hard’ neoliberalism of the 1980s has given way to a more critical approach, accepting alternative views on development.”
Value chains, neoliberalism and development practice: The Indonesian experience (2014, background): “This concern echoes the broader critique of the post-Washington Consensus presented by Öniş and Senses (2005), which highlights the continued protection and support of transnational companies in the world economy under the new consensus.”
Tourism and poverty reduction: theory and practice in less economically developed countries (2012, background): “The Washington Consensus stressed the importance of economic rationalism and efficiency, market liberalisation, and a small role for the state (Öniş & Şenses, 2005; Scheyvens, 2011).”