A general theory of finite state Backward Stochastic Difference Equations
By Samuel N. Cohen, Robert J. R. Elliott. 2008
92 citations recorded by the source corpus.
By analogy with the theory of Backward Stochastic Differential Equations, we define Backward Stochastic Difference Equations on spaces related to discrete time, finite state processes. This paper considers these processes as constructions in their own right, not as approximations to the continuous case. We establish the existence and uniqueness of solutions under weaker assumptions than are needed in the continuous time setting, and also establish a comparison theorem for these solutions. The conditions of this theorem are shown to approximate those required in the continuous time setting. We also explore the relationship between the driver F and the set of solutions; in particular, we determine under what conditions the driver is uniquely determined by the solution. Applications to the theory of nonlinear expectations are explored, including a representation result.
Subfields: Demography, Finance, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/271c0804ac1052242440954decfe5507df8dc7e1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
In Finance
- Samuel N. Cohen
- Robert J. R. Elliott
- Tomasz Klimsiak
- Tak Kuen Siu
- Guang-Hua Lian
- Alessandro Ramponi
- Leunglung Chan
- David Nualart
In Management Science and Operations Research
Citations in the corpus
- Comparisons for backward stochastic differential equations on Markov chains and related no-arbitrage conditions (2008, background): “A corresponding discrete time theory is covered in the paper [5].”
- Existence and Comparisons for BSDEs in general spaces (2010, methodology): “In discrete time, we have shown in [7] that a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a solution to the discrete BSDE is that F is invariant with respect to Z in ‖ · ‖Mt and that y → y−F (ω, t, y, z) is a bijection in y for all z, t and almost all ω.”