On the de la Garza phenomenon

By Min Yang. 2009

85 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Deriving optimal designs for nonlinear models is, in general, challenging. One crucial step is to determine the number of support points needed. Current tools handle this on a case-by-case basis. Each combination of model, optimality criterion and objective requires its own proof. The celebrated de la Garza Phenomenon states that under a (p — 1)th-degree polynomial regression model, any optimal design can be based on at most p design points, the minimum number of support points such that all parameters are estimable. Does this conclusion also hold for nonlinear models? If the answer is yes, it would be relatively easy to derive any optimal design, analytically or numerically. In this paper, a novel approach is developed to address this question. Using this new approach, it can be easily shown that the de la Garza phenomenon exists for many commonly studied nonlinear models, such as the Emax model, exponential model, three- and four-parameter log-linear models, Emax-PK1 model, as well as many classical polynomial regression models. The proposed approach unifies and extends many well-known results in the optimal design literature. It has four advantages over current tools: (i) it can be applied to many forms of nonlinear models; to continuous or discrete data; to data with homogeneous or nonhomogeneous errors; (ii) it can be applied to any design region; (iii) it can be applied to multiple-stage optimal design and (iv) it can be easily implemented.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/271b483913c09fad30aba7c0a168ec1ecf07340c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Holger Dette
  2. Viatcheslav B. Melas
  3. Luc Pronzato
  4. Andrej Pázman
  5. John Stufken
  6. Haiying Wang
  7. Yanyuan Ma
  8. Min Yang

In Geometry and Topology

  1. Luc Pronzato
  2. Andrej Pázman
  3. John Stufken
  4. Holger Dette
  5. Viatcheslav B. Melas
  6. Haiying Wang
  7. Yanyuan Ma

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Luc Pronzato
  2. Andrej Pázman
  3. John Stufken
  4. Holger Dette
  5. Viatcheslav B. Melas
  6. Haiying Wang
  7. Yanyuan Ma
  8. Barnab'as P'oczos

Citations in the corpus