Judgment aggregation: A survey

By Christian List, Clemens Puppe. 2009

282 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/271ad601e717d58487f03188740477bf0d5a6452

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Matthew Braham
2. Vincent Conitzer
3. Martin van Hees
4. Philippe Mongin

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Matthew Braham
2. Ariel D. Procaccia
3. Vincent Conitzer
4. Martin van Hees
5. Philippe Mongin
6. David F. Manlove

Citations in the corpus

• An Anatomy of Moral Responsibility (2012, background): “See List and Puppe (2009) for a general overview of the Discursive Dilemma.”
• Handbook of Computational Social Choice (2016, background): “For a comprehensive review of existential agenda characterization results we refer to List and Puppe (2009).”
• The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory (2012, background): “(This example comes from List and Puppe 2009.) Another relevant distinction, that between D and D∗, cannot be stated in the abstract aggregation framework as naturally as it is in the logical framework. As a secondary technical issue, the initial assumption of a finite number k of propositions is to”