Innovation and Trade with Endogenous Market Failure: The Case of Genetically Modified Products

2004

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/270e4165e6153b805597ead03b1f6756801bf285

Citations in the corpus

• Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-GM crops in the European Union. A review (2011, unknown): “Furthermore, forcing suppliers of GM products to incur labelling costs (such as in the EU) may be counterproductive from a welfare perspective (Lapan and Moschini, 2004).”
• The Economics of Genetically Modified Crops (2009, unknown): “In that case, introducing GM technology would be associated with a negative externality, which would need to be accounted for in welfare economics studies (Giannakas & Fulton 2002, Lapan & Moschini 2004).”
• Agricultural Biotechnology: The Promise and Prospects of Genetically Modified Crops (2014, unknown): “A substantial literature has assessed the distribution of benefi ts and costs from adoption of genetically engineered varieties, mostly using partial equilibrium models (Lapan and Moschini 2004).”
• Genetically Modified Rice Adoption: Implications for Welfare and Poverty Alleviation (2004, unknown): “different from that analyzed by Lapan and Moschini (2004) where the costs of segregation and identity preservation are assumed to be significant.”
• On the Economics of Labels: How Their Introduction Affects the Functioning of Markets and the Welfare of All Participants (2015, unknown): “In a study of GMO-free grain markets, Lapan and Moschini (2007) points out that, since the two types of grain share common handling premises, the presence of some GMO into the GMO-free product is almost unavoidable. Since 100% purity of the GMO-free product is either impossible or highly uneconomica”