Place Attachment and Environmentally Responsible Behavior

By Jerry J. Vaske, Katherine C. Kobrin. 2001

1,130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/270ca74cc80b3208be5efcbcab51cc8873122a3f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

1. M. Lewicka
2. Haywantee Ramkissoon
3. G. Kyle
4. R. Gifford
5. L. Scannell
6. A. Graefe
7. R. Manning
8. T. Lee

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. R. Gifford
2. Lujun Su
3. L. Scannell
4. Julie Ernst
5. T. Lee
6. S. Swanson
7. M. Lewicka
8. S. Cottrell

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. Lewicka
2. Haywantee Ramkissoon
3. G. Kyle
4. T. Lee
5. R. Gifford
6. L. Scannell
7. A. Graefe
8. R. Manning

Citations in the corpus

• Effects of place attachment on users’ perceptions of social and environmental conditions in a natural setting (2004, methodology): “With regard to environmental conditions, Vaske and Kobrin (2001) observed that place identity was a strong and positive predictor of environmentally responsible behavior.”
• Influence of Sociodemographics and Environmental Attitudes on General Responsible Environmental Behavior among Recreational Boaters (2003, methodology): “Finally, a comparison of the models (observing change in chi-square) shows that the full mediation model fits the data better than the direct effects and the partial mediation model does not have a better fit than the full mediation model (Baron & Kenny, 1986; Hayduk, 1987, in Vaske & Kobrin, 2001).”
• Employee workplace spirituality and pro-environmental behavior in the hotel industry (2018, background): “Other studies also indicate that less tangible motivations are more significant drivers of individuals’ PEB than tangible ones (Vaske & Kobrin, 2001; Zibarras & Ballinger, 2011), especially when PEBs are non-obligatory CONTACT Hamed Rezapouraghdam hamed.rezapouraghdam@emu.edu.tr This article was…”
• Place Attachment Enhances Psychological Need Satisfaction (2017, methodology): “For example, claims that place attachment is related to private-sphere proenvironmental behaviors (e.g., Vaske & Kobrin, 2001) could be tested experimentally by manipulating place attachment using a visualization technique.”
• Early-Life Outdoor Experiences and an Individual's Environmental Attitudes (2005, background): “…and Bowler (2001) suggested that natural environments are often viewed by individuals as being restorative, and people may remember them from their childhood within a positive framework, thus altering their perspective on their own environmental perceptions and attitudes (Vaske & Kobrin, 2001).”
• Personally Relevant Climate Change (2013, background): “Place attachment is also associated with more self-reported proenvironmental behaviors (e.g., Clayton, 2003; Scannell & Gifford, 2010b; Vaske & Kobrin, 2001).”
• Place and the Promise of Conservation Psychology (2003, background): “Vaske and Kobrin (2001) suggested that place dependence plus place identity) may result in environmentally-responsible behavior (ERB).”
• The Measurement of Place Attachment: Validity and Generalizability of a Psychometric Approach (2003, background): “For example Vaske and Kobrin (2001) found that place identity was more strongly associated with measures of environmentally responsible behavior.”
• The green care code: How nature connectedness and simple activities help explain pro‐nature conservation behaviours (2020, neutral): “…example differing motives (Molinario et al., 2019; Rode, Gomez-Baggethun, & Krause, 2015), politicized environmental identity (Schmitt, Mackay, Droogendyk, & Payne, 2019) or place attachment (Scannell & Gifford, 2010; Vaske & Kobrin, 2001; Xu & Han, 2019; see also Devine-Wright & Clayton, 2010).”
• Reputation, subjective well-being, and environmental responsibility: the role of satisfaction and identification (2018, background): “Place identity is a significant base of self-identity and is important to linking a person and a location together (Lalli, 1992; Proshansky, Fabian, & Kaminoff, 1983; Stedman, 2002; Vaske & Kobrin, 2001).”