Functional Diversity of Various Constituents of a Single Root System
By Y. Waisel, A. Eshel. 2002
85 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Spectroscopy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/27045ea65299bfa58954405ac5ac6630f587d5e9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- J. Franco
- D. Eissenstat
- Christina E. Wells
- S. Bañón
- M. Vicente
- A. Wasaya
- J. Miralles
- Richard W. Zobel Jr.
Citations in the corpus
- Review Article:Root development in horticultural plants grown under abiotic stress conditions – a review (2011, background): “Conversely, Waisel and Eshel (2002) reported, in a different range of grasses, that branching of the roots usually decreased with decreasing water supply, but the ability of the seedlings of those species to grow with little water had been thought to be related to the greater degree of branching of…”
- Beyond the Roots of Young Seedlings: The Influence of Age and Order on Fine Root Physiology (2002, background): “Within the fine root system of a single fieldgrown plant are roots of numerous branching orders, lengths, diameters, ages, colors, and degrees of mycorrhizal colonization (Afek and others 1990; Pregitzer and others 1997; Wells and Eissenstat 2001; Anderson and others 2002; Mihail and others 2002; Wa”
- Root Phenotyping for Drought Tolerance: A Review (2018, background): “As single root morphology has scarcely been considered for plant’s adaptation strategy to drought conditions, different types of roots can be characterized by various traits [35] to determine the ability of various root classes for water uptake [36].”
- A plant root system architectural taxonomy: A framework for root nomenclature (2010, background): “Discrepancies began to arise when mutations of roots of tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L., Zobel 1975) and corn ( Zea mays L., Hochholdinger et al. 2004) were genetically analysed and the functionality of different root types was compared (Waisel & Eshel 2002, 2009).”