Successive CMEs and complex ejecta

By L. Burlaga, S. Plunkett, O. S. Cyr. 2002

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/26fe66bdeb99b372e25fa20e65d84d1e5bcdcdab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. M. Temmer
2. H. Cane
3. I. G. Richardson
4. N. Lugaz
5. C. Farrugia
6. E. Kilpua
7. P. Démoulin
8. L. Green

In Molecular Biology

1. I. G. Richardson
2. H. Cane
3. M. Temmer
4. J. Davies
5. N. Lugaz
6. E. Kilpua
7. A. Balogh
8. C. Farrugia

Citations in the corpus

• Multiple magnetic clouds: Several examples during March-April 2001 (2003, background): “It was consistent with that for magnetic clouds (b = 0.06 ± 0.04) [Farrugia et al., 1993; Burlaga et al., 2001].”
• Interplanetary flux rope ejected from an X-ray bright point. The smallest magnetic cloud source-region ever observed (2005, background): “Despite the fact that to identify an individual flux rope within a complex ejecta at 1 AU is highly improbable (Burlaga et al. 2002), in this particular case we are able to isolate a small event lasting from 22:00 UT on 15 May to 01:50 UT on 16 May (Fig.”
• A summary of WIND magnetic clouds for years 1995-2003: model-fitted parameters, associated errors and classifications (2006, background): “Also it is possible that any specific MC may be part of multiple or complex ejecta (Burlaga et al., 2002; Farrugia and Berdichevsky, 2004).”
• The Physical Processes of CME/ICME Evolution (2017, unknown): “…interaction involves a faster CME overtaking a slower CME, the end result is to homogenize the speed, as was noted from in situ measurements in Burlaga et al. (2002), Farrugia and Berdichevsky (2004) and through simulations by Schmidt and Cargill (2004) and Lugaz et al. (2005b), among others.”
• Geoeffective Properties of Solar Transients and Stream Interaction Regions (2017, background): “Burlaga et al. (2001, 2002) defined complex ejecta as fast, transient flows resulting from interactions between successive CMEs.”
• The association of coronal mass ejections with their effects near the Earth (2005, unknown): “(2003) phrased it when criticizing Cane et al. (2000), (see also reply by Cane and Richardson, 2003b).”
• THE DEFLECTION OF THE TWO INTERACTING CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS OF 2010 MAY 23–24 AS REVEALED BY COMBINED IN SITU MEASUREMENTS AND HELIOSPHERIC IMAGING (2012, background): “With the improvement of coronagraphic observations, it was confirmed in the 1990s that successive ICMEs can merge, as well as interact with solar wind streams to form a compound stream or complex ejecta (Gopalswamy et al. 2001; Burlaga et al. 2002, 2003; Wang et al. 2002).”
• A survey of interplanetary coronal mass ejections in the near-Earth solar wind during 1996-2002 (2003, methodology): “conform to the strict cloud definition of Burlaga et al. [1981]”