The marginal cost of public funds: Hours of work versus labor force participation
By H. Kleven, C. Kreiner. 2006
256 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/26fbf701381c44123c59b25b9491ef49982fbbf3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Economics and Econometrics
In Gender Studies
Citations in the corpus
- Automatic Stabilizers and Economic Crisis: US vs. Europe (2012, unknown): “…of the proportional income shock, τ I can be interpreted as the EMTR along the intensive margin, whereas in the case of the unemployment shock, it resembles the EMTR along the extensive margin (participation tax rate, see, e.g., Saez (2002), Kleven and Kreiner (2006) or Immervoll et al. (2007)).”
- Evaluation of Four Tax Reforms in the United States: Labor Supply and Welfare Effects for Single Mothers (2008, unknown): “This is difficult to say something about because MCF estimates are highly sensitive to the design of the tax increases (e.g. Kleven and Kreiner, 2006 ).”
- A Unified Welfare Analysis of Government Policies* (2019, unknown): “The MVPF is previously defined in Mayshar (1990) where it is referred to as the marginal excess burden (MEB), in Slemrod and Yitzhaki (1996) where it is referred to as both the marginal cost of funds and/or the marginal benefit of projects, depending on the policy in question and in Kleven and Krein”
- Costs and benefits of Danish active labour market programmes (2008, methodology): “This figure is chosen as the midpoint in the range of estimates for Denmark provided by Kleven and Kreiner (2006).”
- The Policy Elasticity (2016, methodology): “…the framework motivates the use of a simple benefit/cost ratio, adopted previously by Mayshar (1990), Slemrod and Yitzhaki (1996, 2001), and Kleven and Kreiner (2006), as a measure of the marginal value of public funds (MVPF) that can be used to assess the social welfare impacts of…”